Justice at the interface: advancing community and health system resilience through intersectionality theory

Abstract

Current approaches to health system resilience tend to prioritize system-level outcomes (e.g. functionality) while overlooking key underlying social processes, contexts, and power-laden interactions through which resilience is produced. When community resilience is subsumed under health system resilience, without attending to distinct contextual factors, it can lead to fragmented approaches or maladaptive outcomes that misalign with the resilience of communities. Therefore, resilience approaches need to include additional methods that incorporate analyses of power structures and context. We propose intersectionality theory as a methodological lens to investigate the underlying social processes and power dynamics that shape community resilience and health system resilience interactions. An intersectionality approach prompts researchers to distinguish how resilience capacity is derived through the involvement of community actors, their unique intersecting social identities, and their lived experiences. Including an intersectional lens in resilience approaches provides researchers with the tools to identify points of practical constraints that arise at the intersection of communities and health systems, with particular attention on the burdens that are placed on community actors.

Jen Roux, Neelke Doorn, Saba Hinrichs-Krapels, Samantha Copeland, Justice at the interface: advancing community and health system resilience through intersectionality theory, Health Policy and Planning, Volume 41, Issue 3, March 2026, Pages 506–512, https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czag005